The Commentariat -- December 15
Both Tim Egan -- here -- and Gail Collins -- here -- manage to keep from sobbing over our soon-to-be Weeper of the House.
Eric Schmitt of the subversive media outlet known as the New York Times: "The is barring its personnel from using work computers to view the Web sites of The New York Times and more than 25 other news organizations and blogs that have posted secret cables obtained by , Air Force officials said Tuesday."
Elisabeth Bumiller of the New York Times: "As President Obama prepares to release a review of American strategy in Afghanistan that will claim progress in the nine-year-old war there, two new classified intelligence reports offer a more negative assessment and say there is a limited chance of success unless Pakistan hunts down insurgents operating from havens on its Afghan border." Los Angeles Times story here. ...
... CW: I hope you're shocked, shocked, that the New York Times & Los Angeles Times would publish reports divulging information obtained from classified documents. Very WikiLeaky of them. For a more thorough analysis --
... Glenn Greenwald: "... if current reports are correct -- that the Obama DOJ has now convened a Grand Jury to indict WikiLeaks and Julian Assange -- this will constitute a far greater assault on press freedom than anything George W. Bush managed, or even attempted. Put simply, there is no intellectually coherent way to distinguish what WikiLeaks has done ... with what newspapers around the world did in this case and what they do constantly: namely, receive and then publish classified information without authorization."
Jason Linkins' headline says it all: "John Cornyn up in Arms over All the Earmarks Not Requested by John Cornyn." Thanks to Texan Bob M. for the link.
Carol Lee & Glenn Thrush of Politico: "President Barack Obama has delayed the most significant staff shuffle of his presidency until after New Year’s — but the changes may be more sweeping than anticipated and could include the hiring of high-profile Democrats defeated in the midterms. ...
... President Obama has made some mistakes, but none compares to this one:
With Majority Leader Harry Reid threatening to keep the Senate at work through January 4, the Upper Chamber gets moving (think Benny Hill):
... You can see the whole Rachel Maddow segment here.
Charles Babington of the AP: "A growing chorus of conservative criticism is prompting some House members to rethink the $850 billion package of tax cuts and extended jobless benefits that President Barack Obama negotiated with top Republicans in Congress. The attacks are unlikely to derail the measure.... The new reproach from conservatives is that the package would swell the federal debt while failing to make permanent the tax cuts enacted in 2001 and 2003 by then-President George W. Bush.
"Advise and Obstruct." New York Times Editors: "The Senate’s power to advise and consent on federal judicial nominations was intended as a check against sorely deficient presidential choices. It is not a license to exercise partisan influence over these vital jobs by blocking confirmation of entire slates of well-qualified nominees.... At this point, the Senate has approved 41 — barely half — of President Obama’s federal and district court nominees reported by the Judiciary Committee. Compare that with the first two years of the George W. Bush administration when the Senate approved all 100 of the judicial nominations approved by the committee."
Kathleen Hennessey in the Los Angeles Times: "After years of courting Latino voters with a softer tone on immigration, Republican leaders in Congress have all but abandoned that posture, risking what remains of GOP support among the fastest-growing segment of the U.S. population. The latest example is the near-unanimous opposition by Senate Republicans to the Dream Act, a measure that provides a way for some illegal immigrants who arrived in the U.S. as children to become citizens."
David Leonhardt of the New York Times: "Nearly every time this country has expanded its social safety net or tried to guarantee civil rights, passionate opposition has followed. The opposition stems from the tension between two competing traditions in the American economy. One is the laissez-faire tradition that celebrates individuality and risk-taking. The other is the progressive tradition that says people have a right to a minimum standard of living — time off from work, education and the like." CW: AND, there's this:
Nick Anderson of the Houston Chronicle. Thanks to Ina M.
More on Richard Holbrooke:
... Peter Beinert of the Daily Beast: "Holbrooke didn't only push harder than his colleagues; he also cared more." ...
... Jonathan Alter: "Holbrooke belongs to a tiny group of diplomats—men like George Kennan and Chip Bohlen — who shaped their times as much as any secretary of state." ...
... Rick Hertzberg: "If the Supreme Court had allowed the votes to be counted in 2000, then [Holbrooke], almost certainly, would have become the Secretary of State, and the next decade would have unfolded very differently." ...
... AND Rajiv Chandrasekaran & Karen DeYoung of the Washington Post try to give more context to Holbrooke's Last Words.