The Commentariat -- November 16
President Obama awards the Medal of Honor to Army SSgt. Salvatore Giunta. Here's the New York Times story on Giunta's acts of valor:
Michael Moore tells Senate Democrats they've got seven weeks to get off their asses & pass the 420 bills the House already passed. CW: unfortunately, the majority of Senate Democrats are not of a mind to do what's right by the American people.
** Michael Hudson, writing for AlterNet, demonstrates how President Obama's cynical economic policy is indistinguishable from Bush-Cheney pro-Wall Street policies."
Charlie Rangel and Congressional Ethics Farce. Dana Milbank: "The man who until recently had sway over hundreds of billions of dollars as chairman of the Ways and Means Committee was now claiming that he was too indigent to hire a lawyer. Half an hour into the public hearing he had demanded for so long, Rangel announced that he was leaving."
We never did enough in terms of [the unemployment rate] for us to have the kind of success we would have. We had a Roosevelt moment and responded like Hoover.-- Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.) ...
... Jordan Fabian of The Hill: "Rep. John Larson (Conn.), the House Democratic Caucus chairman who is expected to keep his position in a vote on Wednesday, said that his party did not do enough in the eyes of voters to help bring down the nation's 9.6 percent unemployment rate."
Tom Scotta, in Slate, has a terrific takedown, not just of partisan pollsters Pat Caddell & Douglas Schoen for their disingenuous "bilge," but also of the lowlife editor of the Washington Post's editorial page Fred Hiatt:
Fred Hiatt, the insufferable editor of the Post's opinion pages, seems to believe that people hate his section because he has clung with fearless integrity to his support for invading Iraq ... and because the section's overall politics are to the right of the beliefs of the average reader of the Washington Post. Actually, the reason some of us despise Hiatt and his section is that he consistently chooses to print dishonest garbage, composed by disingenuous partisan hacks, lobbyists, or lobbyist-hacks. The Post opinion section is ... a place where ... professional propagandists float their newest lies, slogans, and unsubstantiated nonsense, to see if they can get them to bob into the political mainstream.
Speaking of hacks writing op-ed nonsense for the Washington Post, here's pseudo-journalist Keith Olbermann harumphing about former journalist Ted Koppel's harumphing over Olbermann & his part in the "death of real news." Keith gets it right:
CBS News: "Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowki told CBS News' Katie Couric today that she would not support Sarah Palin for president because Palin lacks the "leadership qualities" and "intellectual curiosity" to craft great policy":
... Matt Bai of the New York Times: the airing of the first episode of "Sarah Palin's Alaska" is just a reminder that Sarah Palin herself is a media production. "Palin expertly allowed herself to be shaped by the demands of the marketplace, and in this way she became the best example yet of a new phenomenon in our politics -- what we might think of as the crowd-sourced candidate."
... Nick Bilton of the New York Times: "... refudiate has been named the word of the year by the New Oxford American Dictionary, published by the Oxford University Press, beating out a number of other locutions - many technology-related -- that have spread through the language and the Web over the past year."
Alex Pareene of Salon has an appropriately snarky take on Ginni Thomas' departure or demotion or whatever from her tea party "non-profit": "Not because political activism and fundraising (from anonymous donors) by the wife of a Supreme Court justice raises ethical questions, but because the media keeps bugging Ginni about said ethical questions. Just last month, Ginni had to remove her name from a 'memo' that called Obamacare unconstitutional, so that her husband wouldn't have to recuse himself when it came time for him to decide that Obamacare is unconstitutional." ...
Wonkette, of course, is even snarkier. Highly recommended for a laugh.
Carl Hulse of the New York Times: "Senate Republicans opened the lame-duck session of Congress on Monday by signaling their commitment to the antispending posture that fueled their big gains on Election Day, underscoring the Tea Party movement’s influence on the Republican leadership. Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, drove the point home as soon as the Senate convened by announcing that he would support a proposed ban on Congressional earmarks, reversing his longtime practice of avidly pursuing money for his state." ...
... Michael Shear of the New York Times thinks John McCain, who for years has made the banning of earmarks his cri de coeur, must have a bittersweet reaction to President Obama & former earmark lovers being the ones who may actually end earmarks.
Republican Hypocrisy Watch. Glenn Thrush of Politico: Freshman Maryland Republican Congressman Andy Harris, a physician no less, was upset to learn his government-subsidized health insurance policy would not kick in the day he was sworn in. "Harris then asked if he could purchase insurance from the government to cover the gap," said a congressional staffer who saw the exchange. The staffer "was struck by the similarity to Harris’s request and the public option he denounced as a gateway to socialized medicine." ...
... I think we finally have a working definition of a health insurance crisis -- when a member of Congress has to go a whole month without coverage. Of course nothing's stopping him [Rep. Harris] from using his own money and purchasing private health insurance in the individual market. Those onerous Obamacare regulations haven't taken effect yet so he can explore the wonders of a still-functioning private insurance market as God and Adam Smith intended. -- Jonathan Chait of The New Republic