Decoding the State of the Union

Peter Nicholas of the Chicago Tribune: "President Obama will call for a five year freeze on non-security discretionary spending in his State of the Union address Tuesday night, White House officials said, in a bid to help reduce the deficit and counter public perceptions that he spent too freely in his first two years in power."

Ezra Klein on "Competitiveness": "Framing the global economy as a competition rather than a shared enterprise preys on our fear of rising powers such as China and India. But, to the White House, it's for a good cause: It gets America's competitive juices flowing, helping galvanize us into making the changes and investments needed to secure our own future. The true competition that the White House is setting up is not between the economic models of China and the United States, but between the economic policies of Democrats and Republicans."

Michael Shear of the New York Times: "... advisers say Mr. Obama will lay out his case for investment in education and infrastructure, while tempering his call for new initiatives with an acknowledgment of the country’s long-term fiscal challenges."

Michael Crowley of Time adds his two cents: "This will, in effect, be Obama's opening pitch for re-election in the 2012 presidential campaign."

Perry Bacon, Jr. of the Washington Post: "Now, the president is expected to offer a series of proposals that don't fall on sharp ideological lines as last year's health care bill did, but will still test the two parties' ability to work together. He is expected to tout deficit reduction, but the two sides don't agree on how to get there. Republicans largely favor spending cuts, Democrats a combination of cuts and tax increases."

Marching Orders for Talking Heads (Picture That). Jake Tapper: "A cavalcade of Democratic talking heads were beckoned to the White House to be briefed on the president’s State of the Union address by White House senior advisers David Axelrod and Stephanie Cutter and communications director Dan Pfeiffer."

Decodng the Rebuttal. Richard E. Cohen of Politico: "In rejecting [President] Obama’s planned call for 'targeted investments'—which Republicans contend is a metaphor for more stimulus spending—[Rep. Paul] Ryan reportedly will respond that the 'spending binge' of the past two years failed to stem historic unemployment and the nation’s largest deficits. Instead, he will emphasize the need to cut federal spending in order to boost job creation." CW: what a surprise.

AND for the subtext of Michele Bachmann's rebuttal to the rebuttal, she has released her own budget proposal which involves stuff like eliminating the Department of Education & raising revenues by leasing "leasing land in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas companies." The sub-subtext of course is Bachmann for President.

Seating Arrangements (Con'd.)

Jennifer Epstein of Politico: "Rep. Gabrielle Giffords will be honored Tuesday night with an empty seat in the House chamber during the State of the Union address. Jeff Flake, a Republican, and Raul Grijalva, a Democrat, plan to sit together for the speech and keep a seat open for Giffords...." Here's a related Arizona Republic story.

Some Seating Arrangement Are Written in Stone. We know Justice Alito won't show up for the State of the Union address, as he "is taking advantage of a perfectly timed speaking engagement in Hawaii to avoid the event at which he became a reluctant player last January." We don't know what other Supreme's will skip the SOTU, but we do know where they sit on the Court. Click on the picture below to take a fun interactive quiz to see if you can put the members in their seats on the Court: