Remembrances of Pantyhose Past
Since Frank Rich left the Times, Maureen Dowd has been trying to fill his shoes. Rich has a knack for seeing and exploiting the connections between retail politics and cultural fads and phenomena. Dowd does not, though evidently she thinks she does. In today's column, one of her lamest yet, she makes a stab at contrasting the demented, abusive Charlie Sheen with a fashion photographer named Bill Cunningham. She begins her essay by recounting an incident in which "a fashion designer" once "humiliated" her by publicly dissing her choice of pantyhose, after which Cunningham cheered her up by snapping her photo. Dowd ends her tour de faiblesse with Cunningham's remark, “As a kid, I went to church and all I did was look at women’s hats.”
Not surprisingly, the Times moderators rejected my comment, but I think it's a valid criticism. It probably is more worthwhile reading than Dowd's column. The terms of usage on your Adobe Flashdrive download are more worthwhile reading than Dowd's column. My comment:
This column would be appropriate to the "Style" section or perhaps even to the "Arts" section, but it does not belong on the op-ed page. The opposition you attempt to draw between Bill Cunningham and Charlie Sheen is thinner than a runway model. That both men have something to do with women is about as useful as contrasting the National Organization for Women with pantyhose, both of which have -- something to do with women.
Speaking of pantyhose, I don't know any adult women who would care if some evidently drunken and unquestionably boorish fashion designer didn't like theirs. I cannot think of anything any more trivial than the fashion correctness of pantyhose. I don't wear them. Besides, fashion designers are incapable of humiliating me. I don't care what they think because their entire frame of reference is superficial -- sort of like a guy who goes to church and thinks about hats.
If you want to write about how the world treats women, there are dozens of better ways to do so, and some of those better ways have come from you: for instance, your columns on the Roman Catholic Church's mistreatment of American nuns. Get back to journalism, please, Ms. Dowd, and leave the film reviews and fashion-world profiles for the pros in other sections of the paper.