The Commentariat -- January 10
Lyndsey Layton of the Washington Post: "The federal government is poised for the first time to make public thousands of complaints it receives each year about safety problems with various products.... The compilation of consumer complaints [on a database], set to be launched online in March by the Consumer Product Safety Commission, has been hailed by consumer advocates as a resource that will revolutionize the way people make buying decisions."
Keith Bradsher of the New York Times: "The military appropriations law signed by contains a little-noticed 'Buy American' provision for the Defense Department purchases of solar panels — a provision that is likely to dismay Chinese officials as President Hu Jintao prepares to visit the United States next week.
on FridayJeffrey Smith of the Washington Post: the trial of former Republican House Leader Tom DeLay is going into the sentencing phase, which could be quite a show.
Robert Pear of the New York Times: "The Obama administration, following a lengthy internal debate, has unexpectedly come down on the side of pharmaceutical companies that are accused of overcharging public hospitals and clinics that care for large numbers of poor people. The administration has told the Supreme Court that the hospitals and clinics should not be permitted to sue drug companies to enforce their right to deep discounts on drugs, or to collect reimbursement from companies that overcharge. It is a classic conflict: a political imperative for the administration — to ensure that inexpensive drugs are available to the poor people who need them — rubbing up against the Justice Department’s fear of an onslaught of lawsuits by clinics and hospitals if the Supreme Court allows them to sue." CW: sorry, this doesn't surprise me; the Obama administration has been so Big Pharma friendly that I would be surprised if there was "a lengthy internal debate."
Noam Cohen of the New York Times: "... the government obtained a secret subpoena from a federal court [for Twitter account details of people associated with WikiLeaks]. Twitter challenged the secrecy, not the subpoena itself, and won the right to inform the people whose records the government was seeking. WikiLeaks says it suspects that other large sites like Google and Facebook have received similar requests and simply went along with the government. This kind of order is far more common than one may think, and in the case of terrorism and espionage investigations the government can issue them without a court order. The government says more than 50,000 of these requests, known as national security letters, are sent each year, but they come with gag orders that prevent those contacted from revealing what the agency has been seeking or even the existence of the gag orders." ...
... AP Backstory, January 8: "U.S. officials have issued a subpoena to demand details about WikiLeaks' Twitter account, the group announced Saturday, adding that it suspected other American Internet companies were also being ordered to hand over information about its activities. In a statement, WikiLeaks said U.S. investigators had gone to the San Francisco-based Twitter Inc. to demand the private messages, contact information and other personal details of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and other supporters, including the U.S. Army intelligence analyst suspected of handing classified information to the site and a high-profile Icelandic parliamentarian."